<node id="63701">
  <nid>63701</nid>
  <type>news</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="27205"><![CDATA[27205]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1295432330</created>
  <changed>1475896082</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[The Anti-Illinois: Georgia debates a tax reform with lower rates.]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p>The genius of American federalism is that states can choose to walk off
a policy cliff—or not. Illinois has just raised taxes, but Georgia may be
moving in the opposite direction by cutting taxes to make the state a more
attractive destination for workers and business.</p>

<p>A bipartisan tax commission chartered last year by the legislature is
proposing that Georgia cut its personal and corporate tax rates by a third, to
a flat 4% from a high of 6%. "Our overriding goal was to get the income
tax rate as low as possible, because the evidence is so clear that this is the
biggest driver of growth and jobs," says commission member Christine Ries,
an economist at Georgia Tech. The plan is a "revenue neutral" shift
to a cleaner and simpler state tax code.</p>

<p>To pay for the lower rates, the commission proposes to expand the reach
of the state's 4% sales tax (6% in Atlanta and many localities) to groceries
and many tax-exempt industries, ranging from auto repair to barbers to the film
industry. Predictably, businesses that don't pay tax now are lobbying to
maintain favored treatment.</p>

<p>The plan follows the first principle of a sound and fair tax system:
Apply a low rate to a broad base. The most controversial change is the grocery
tax, which liberal critics call a regressive levy on the poor. In fact, the
proposal would increase the personal exemption to offset the food tax for
low-income families.</p>

<p>Georgia's new Governor, Republican Nathan Deal, says he supports
"elements of the plan" without specifying which ones. The GOP controls
more seats in the legislature than at any time since Reconstruction, so a major
tax reform is possible.</p>

<p>A reform that lowers rates would set Georgia apart from California, New
Jersey, Oregon and Maryland, which have all raised tax rates in the last decade
only to see millionaire incomes vanish and revenue decline. Georgia would be
smart to go even further and join the nine states, including Florida and Texas,
that have no income tax. But even the commission's reform would make the Peach
State more competitive for job creation, and ultimately lead to a better
economy and higher tax revenues.</p><p>Review &amp; Outlook</p><p>Wall Street Journal&nbsp;</p><p>January 19, 2011</p><ul><li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/search?article-doc-type=%7BReview+%26+Outlook+%28U.S.%29%7D&amp;HEADER_TEXT=review+%26+outlook+%28u.s.">REVIEW &amp; OUTLOOK</a></li><li>JANUARY 19, 2011&nbsp;</li><li>Wall Street Journal Online</li></ul>]]></body>
  <field_subtitle>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[Georgia debates a tax reform with lower rates.]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_subtitle>
  <field_dateline>
    <item>
      <value>2011-01-19T00:00:00-05:00</value>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_dateline>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA["Our overriding goal was to get the income tax rate as low as possible, because the evidence is so clear that this is the biggest driver of growth and jobs."]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[<p>A bipartisan tax commission chartered last year by the legislature is
proposing that Georgia cut its personal and corporate tax rates by a third, to
a flat 4% from a high of 6%. "Our overriding goal was to get the income
tax rate as low as possible, because the evidence is so clear that this is the
biggest driver of growth and jobs," says commission member Christine Ries,
an economist at Georgia Tech. The plan is a "revenue neutral" shift
to a cleaner and simpler state tax code.</p>]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_media>
          <item>
        <nid>
          <node id="63095">
            <nid>63095</nid>
            <type>image</type>
            <title><![CDATA[Professor Christine Ries]]></title>
            <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
                          <field_image>
                <item>
                  <fid>191728</fid>
                  <filename><![CDATA[christine_ries2.jpg]]></filename>
                  <filepath><![CDATA[/sites/default/files/images/christine_ries2_0.jpg]]></filepath>
                  <file_full_path><![CDATA[http://www.tlwarc.hg.gatech.edu//sites/default/files/images/christine_ries2_0.jpg]]></file_full_path>
                  <filemime>image/jpeg</filemime>
                  <image_740><![CDATA[]]></image_740>
                  <image_alt><![CDATA[Professor Christine Ries]]></image_alt>
                </item>
              </field_image>
            
                      </node>
        </nid>
      </item>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[kari.white@econ.gatech.edu]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_contact_email>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[<p>Kari White</p><p>Communications Coordinator</p><p>School of Economics</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <!--  TO DO: correct to not conflate categories and news room topics  -->
  <!--  Disquisition: it's funny how I write these TODOs and then never
         revisit them. It's as though the act of writing the thing down frees me
         from the responsibility to actually solve the problem. But what can I
         say? There are more problems than there's time to solve.  -->
  <links_related> </links_related>
  <files> </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>1282</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item>
        <![CDATA[Student and Faculty]]>
      </item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>134</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Student and Faculty]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <core_research_areas>
      </core_research_areas>
  <field_news_room_topics>
      </field_news_room_topics>
  <links_related>
          <link>
      <url>http://online.wsj.com/home-page</url>
      <title></title>
      </link>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>1282</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[School of Economics]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>602</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[economics]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <tid>11682</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Georgia Tax Code Reform]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata>
      <![CDATA[]]>
  </field_userdata>
</node>
